<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay Per Post and Review Me Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/</link>
	<description>going where no blog has gone before</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:40:22 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Phung</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-9808</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Phung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/#comment-9808</guid>
		<description>I just did a review of the 3 main paid blogging services too. Not with comparison charts or anything, but mine is from more of an advertiser&#039;s perspective (it pretty much assumes that you don&#039;t think going in that paid blogging is evil). 

I&#039;m interested in your thoughts:
http://www.all-about-content.com/2007/03/advertisers-perspective-on-blogsvertise.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did a review of the 3 main paid blogging services too. Not with comparison charts or anything, but mine is from more of an advertiser&#8217;s perspective (it pretty much assumes that you don&#8217;t think going in that paid blogging is evil). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in your thoughts:<br />
<a href="http://www.all-about-content.com/2007/03/advertisers-perspective-on-blogsvertise.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.all-about-content.com/2007/03/advertisers-perspective-on-blogsvertise.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>@Beth,

I couldn&#039;t have agreed with you more. ReviewMe gives you a value and somehow it sort of looks degrading when you&#039;re on the last page of a certain category. (don&#039;t think if you&#039;re on the first means an advertiser will pay that price as well) PPP gives everybody an equal chance regardless of your &quot;Alexa&quot; rank or how many other sites link to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Beth,</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t have agreed with you more. ReviewMe gives you a value and somehow it sort of looks degrading when you&#8217;re on the last page of a certain category. (don&#8217;t think if you&#8217;re on the first means an advertiser will pay that price as well) PPP gives everybody an equal chance regardless of your &#8220;Alexa&#8221; rank or how many other sites link to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-3453</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/#comment-3453</guid>
		<description>PPP is by far a better choice for smaller, lesser known blogs. Why? Because ReviewMe and others rely on advertisers to choose which blogs to advertise on- with PPP *I* have the ability to determine if an ad is appropriate. I&#039;m not limited in my opportunities because I don&#039;t receive 20,000 hits a day. And with ReviewMe using Technorati and Alexa to determine if a blog is worthy of acceptance- is a little shaky at best-neither service is stable, especially Technorati over the past year. As for the &quot;PPP users are forced to write positive reviews,&quot; issue- we aren&#039;t. This is a misconception of the service. If an advertiser states a review MUST be positive- I simply do not take the opportunity. And, what a lot of us are finding- our blogs are gaining traffic, maybe it&#039;s due to PPP opps, or, perhaps it&#039;s due to the &quot;blacklist&quot; of bloggers, posted on a blog about a month ago. Face it- marketing is here to stay, whether we write, or insert code-there is no difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPP is by far a better choice for smaller, lesser known blogs. Why? Because ReviewMe and others rely on advertisers to choose which blogs to advertise on- with PPP *I* have the ability to determine if an ad is appropriate. I&#8217;m not limited in my opportunities because I don&#8217;t receive 20,000 hits a day. And with ReviewMe using Technorati and Alexa to determine if a blog is worthy of acceptance- is a little shaky at best-neither service is stable, especially Technorati over the past year. As for the &#8220;PPP users are forced to write positive reviews,&#8221; issue- we aren&#8217;t. This is a misconception of the service. If an advertiser states a review MUST be positive- I simply do not take the opportunity. And, what a lot of us are finding- our blogs are gaining traffic, maybe it&#8217;s due to PPP opps, or, perhaps it&#8217;s due to the &#8220;blacklist&#8221; of bloggers, posted on a blog about a month ago. Face it- marketing is here to stay, whether we write, or insert code-there is no difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-3118</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/#comment-3118</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been discussing the whole per per post thing over at Quit Your Day Job and I think it&#039;s a tough issue with a lot of people divided.

Pay for Posting - http://blog.sarge.com.au/?p=19

How it may effect new readers - http://blog.sarge.com.au/?p=22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been discussing the whole per per post thing over at Quit Your Day Job and I think it&#8217;s a tough issue with a lot of people divided.</p>
<p>Pay for Posting &#8211; <a href="http://blog.sarge.com.au/?p=19" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sarge.com.au/?p=19</a></p>
<p>How it may effect new readers &#8211; <a href="http://blog.sarge.com.au/?p=22" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sarge.com.au/?p=22</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netfreez</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>Netfreez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>I am currently testing both web applications, but from what I know so far PPR is leading in my book.

damir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently testing both web applications, but from what I know so far PPR is leading in my book.</p>
<p>damir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everybodygoto.com/2006/11/12/pay-per-post-and-review-me-comparison/#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>I guess if you tell people that the post is a paid one. It won&#039;t reflect on the blogger&#039;s personality and all as he/she is paid to do something. Kinda artificial.

However, this is just what I think :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if you tell people that the post is a paid one. It won&#8217;t reflect on the blogger&#8217;s personality and all as he/she is paid to do something. Kinda artificial.</p>
<p>However, this is just what I think <img src='http://www.everybodygoto.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
